Berlin Marzahn and suburban developments
in Regina are quite different even though their development is quite
similar. While they both were, in large
part, entirely built up over a short period and have almost everything one
needs (prompting people to not leave), they contain a two major ideological
differences in the design and planning of the areas which change the entire way
the areas are used by its inhabitants.
First, the types of housing between
the two areas are quite different, even though they are and were considered
quite luxurious for their times. Marzahn’s
development is dense, tall apartment buildings, while Regina’s suburbs contain
low density housing, like houses and small condominiums. In part, this is due to the sheer demand for
the housing; Marzahn was built because the demand was large and desperately
required, whereas Regina’s growth is more tame and less demanding on the
housing market.
Secondly, the areas themselves were
designed with two different philosophies – car friendly and pedestrian
friendly. At least from the small
portion of where we visited, cars were not necessary to travel in Marzahn as public
transit was readily available in form of trams and buses. Additionally, most services (e.g. grocery
stores) were in the center of a ring of residences. In contrast, many of Regina’s suburbs require
a car to perform tasks like getting groceries, and transit services are quite
limited for those who wish to go without a car.
While there are other, smaller
differences between the two, they are caused by the two major factors discussed
above.
2 comments:
Apart from the two philosophies you mentioned (pedestrian vs. car friendly) the socialist and capitalist philosophies certainly are key elements in the design of these different neighbourhoods.
That's a very good point. I believe some of the others who discussed this mentioned hints of these two different philosophies as well, and it certainly is apparent.
Post a Comment